A robotics businessman working to make the economy more human.
@robocosmist
- I'm posting TerrAvion's example Start-up Procedures Guide / Operating Handbook so that there's a free to copy one--… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 months ago
- RT @mnolangray: Does new market-rate development drive displacement? In fact, the evidence suggests the opposite. lao.ca.gov/Publications/R… h… 3 months ago
- Literal Mountains of CO2 Need to Come Out of the Air robocosmist.com/2021/01/27/lit… 6 months ago
- I just signed a @theactionnet petition: Support new homes at 6501 Shattuck Avenue!. Sign here: actionnetwork.org/petitions/supp… 6 months ago
- RT @cafedujord: Fun fact: this outfit would be illegal to wear in most of California's cities 6 months ago
- What's actually going to get us back under 350 PPM CO2 in our lifetimes? Sequestering Agricultural Carbon in Deep A… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 7 months ago
USA #1 & #2
2012/06/05 by Robert Morris Leave a comment
For all the wrangling about the future of U.S. spaceflight, the New York Times had an article to remind us today that the U.S. not only has the largest spaceflight program in the world (NASA), but also the second largest space flight program in the world (DoD).
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/05/science/space/repurposed-telescope-may-explore-secrets-of-dark-energy.html
I think the real consternation comes from the fact that all spaceflight that has a compelling rationale is unmanned. This rise of the robots in the budget somehow has people confused about what our space programs are capable of.
Share this:
Like this:
Filed under Commentary, Economics Tagged with budget, DoD, economic, NASA, policy, robotics, technology, unmanned systems